Monday, May 30, 2011

rihanna magazine gq

rihanna magazine gq. FOR UK GQ MAGAZINE: FELLAS
  • FOR UK GQ MAGAZINE: FELLAS


  • vincenz
    Feb 25, 02:07 PM
    picture

    How is that iMac floating in the air like that? Unless mine eyes deceive me.




    rihanna magazine gq. for British#39;s GQ Magazine.
  • for British#39;s GQ Magazine.


  • PodPacker
    Mar 26, 10:30 PM
    Just got my hands on the latest DVDs and I hope to have this (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161350&cm_re=his_6870-_-14-161-350-_-Product&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-_-na-_-na-_-na&AID=10446076&PID=3640352&SID=skim292X457X738749bfb67cbcce684cebad603a1577) soon. I'll let you guys know how it turns out on my Mac Pro 3,1




    rihanna magazine gq. British GQ is heating up the
  • British GQ is heating up the


  • jholzner
    Sep 6, 05:57 PM
    Does anyone else think that Apple really really needs a rental model for the movie store? I'm against it with music but it's not the same a movies. I don't want my harddrive full of these things. I would be nice to rent one for much less, watch it and delete it. I don't see it being very successful if it is for purchase only.




    rihanna magazine gq. of British GQ Magazine,
  • of British GQ Magazine,


  • ikir
    May 3, 12:49 AM
    Very handy!




    rihanna magazine gq. Rihanna in GQ magazine: #39;I
  • Rihanna in GQ magazine: #39;I


  • tedrjr03
    Feb 6, 09:52 AM
    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5290/5299339710_547865898a.jpg

    New pickup. 2002 Subaru WRX




    rihanna magazine gq. version of quot;GQquot; magazine.
  • version of quot;GQquot; magazine.


  • ipearx
    Aug 7, 05:48 AM
    An iPhone, not as a cell phone, but as a landline skype style wifi cordless phone to go with iChat. Wouldn't that make sense for Apple to make? Ties in with their computers & iLife, would work in all countries, and would be easy, and possibly cheap for them to make.

    Steve Jobs, would probably want want to make a phone that transitions seamlessly between indoor wifi and the cell networks.




    rihanna magazine gq. Rihanna GQ US January 2010
  • Rihanna GQ US January 2010


  • spicyapple
    Nov 28, 10:15 AM
    Microsoft lost billions on the Xbox and likely to lose hundreds of millions on their Zune attempt. iPod sales have been profitable for Apple since their introduction. How one measures success in this industry can't always be marketshare.




    rihanna magazine gq. -GQ Magazine
  • -GQ Magazine


  • nagromme
    Apr 2, 07:05 PM
    This ad will never work. People want ads that make them feel like teenage boys. I know this from Android ads. Steel and lasers, Apple. Steel and lasers!




    rihanna magazine gq. Rihanna Files a $26k
  • Rihanna Files a $26k


  • Mulyahnto
    Jul 19, 04:03 PM
    Actually, they were completely off base with their Mac estimates. Since it appears that most people on Wall St. think that Apple only makes iPods, this is no surprise.

    Most estimates were for around 1 million Macs sold. Apple came in at 1.3 million. There's the margin difference right there.

    This is what page 1 reported a couple days ago:


    They predict Apple sales results that are close to but slightly lower than the Wall Street consensus estimates, with iPod quarterly sales between 7.7 and 8.3 million units, Mac sales of 1.2 to 1.23 million units, and revenue of $4.6 billion and $0.48 earnings per share, compared to Wall Street estimates for revenue of $4.95 billion and $0.52 earnings per share.




    rihanna magazine gq. photoshoot for GQ magazine
  • photoshoot for GQ magazine


  • barkins
    Nov 28, 02:06 PM
    Why are we still talking about the Zune. Does anyone really care? It's just another mp3 player among so many others behind iPod. :rolleyes:

    It will never match the iPod's popularity, ever.




    rihanna magazine gq. edition of GQ magazine !!!
  • edition of GQ magazine !!!


  • bushido
    Apr 2, 10:34 AM
    command + forward slash ;)

    THANK YOU!

    ---

    safari got some fixes to it seems, scrolling works smoother and doesn't get stuck on pages with lots of pics or vids and the error with not being able to type anything unless u close safari seems to be fixed as well.




    rihanna magazine gq. for GQ Magazine Jan.
  • for GQ Magazine Jan.


  • soulreaver99
    Jan 2, 06:05 PM
    http://blog.getitnext.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/02/08_toyota_prius_2.jpg

    Toyota Prius 2008 (Stock Photo)

    Might get an Infinity or Lexus later this year but this car has been extremely reliable and saved me a ton of gas money since I got it!




    rihanna magazine gq. video rihanna gq magazine
  • video rihanna gq magazine


  • chaosbunny
    May 3, 12:54 AM
    Might be nice for people who actually use the App Store.




    rihanna magazine gq. rihanna gq magazine
  • rihanna gq magazine


  • JoeG4
    Feb 20, 03:42 AM
    Do you go to UMD by any chance? :confused: Because that looks almost exactly like my dorm down to the tiny desk they give you.

    After participating in "mac setup" threads for more years than I wish to admit, I think most dorms have that atrocious little table and that matching funny looking chair with the skinny back that looks really uncomfortable.
    :D


    Seriously though, it's like they are intentionally trying to cause that wrist problem (I forget the name XD) with those keyboard drawers!




    rihanna magazine gq. Rihanna strips for GQ
  • Rihanna strips for GQ


  • sminman
    Jan 11, 06:10 PM
    I don't see the benefit of a MacBook Slim.

    Can someone pursued me or tell me why it would be better then just having a MacBook?




    rihanna magazine gq. Rihanna in GQ UK Magazine 10
  • Rihanna in GQ UK Magazine 10


  • JunBug119
    Nov 26, 10:44 PM
    Hate it when a coworker shoves me an order form and I feel obligated to purchase something.
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v328/BurningSensation/ChocCaramelCrunchPackage2.jpg

    Tennis elbow sucks
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v328/BurningSensation/mueller-adjustable-elbow-support4521300.jpg

    For my netbook
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v328/BurningSensation/logitech-n315-lapdesk-156-notebook-cooler-dc939-000182.jpg

    For the mentioned netbook cause I hate using the trackpad
    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v328/BurningSensation/Microsoft-Wireless-Mobile-Mouse-4000-with-BlueTrack.jpg




    rihanna magazine gq. Rihanna in GQ UK Magazine (10
  • Rihanna in GQ UK Magazine (10


  • jgould
    Feb 20, 04:25 PM
    Ok, So I moved the Mini back to the corner where it sat before, and added my wireless trackpad and keyboard to the desk. I'm still not sure on the keyboard. it feels different than the one built into the MBP. I think it might feel mushy... I need to put something on top of my desk so that things don't slid around... The trackpad will slide as I move it as will the MBP if it's sitting on the desk surface...




    rihanna magazine gq. Rihanna - GQ Magazine
  • Rihanna - GQ Magazine


  • twoodcc
    Aug 29, 10:15 AM
    UPDATE:

    It looks like the GMA X3000 is ready to go now, but a Yonah coupled with a X3000 IGP would still make the Mini a great machine.

    wow, now that would be something




    rihanna magazine gq. Rihanna in GQ Topless Shoot
  • Rihanna in GQ Topless Shoot


  • dongmin
    Jan 13, 01:34 AM
    Hmm maybe they could get around this by shipping bluetooth headphones with it.

    And the no-plug dock charging sounds good too.

    Imagine a ultra portable macbook with no ports.

    It would have a docking station with a lot of ports in the dock but it would all wirelessly be transfered to the macbook.

    No clicking into the dock. Just set it down.

    If the dock could be integrated into the desk it could look like you are just setting it on the desk.

    But it is wirelessly sending power and signals with the dock which has usb, firewire, large HD, optical drive, headphone jacks, and other ports that are hidden under the desk.

    Edit: just realized that in the time I took to reply someone else already pointed out bluetooth headphones.

    So the only way to use a thumb drive or download photos from a camera or sync your iPod/iPhone is through your dock when you're at home???

    This IS the most ridiculous thing I've heard in a while.




    emotion
    Nov 27, 02:33 PM
    Sorry, that link doesn't say anything about the 20" monitors referenced in the original thread.

    The inference is that the technology used in the 20" versions of those displays is the same.




    Earendil
    Nov 27, 09:49 PM
    IMAGINED?

    Let's look at the facts.

    20" Apple $699 - Dell $399
    23" Apple $999 - Dell $799 (24")
    30" Apple $1999 - Dell $1499

    Those are real numbers. Dell has brighter specs, more connection options, and with the 23" they have a 24" that's still $200 cheaper.

    And what, exactly, is your point? Really, did you read the thread? Okay, mb not, did you read anything that I wrote? No? Did you follow the linked thread that has been used as a counter point to the FUD that is spread? No?

    What imaginary planet are you on? $300, $200, and $500 difference in price respectively. That's real money. And it pressures people into considering a Dell. (Bad Apple!) All you are really getting for those extra hundres of dollars is a display that looks nice with your mini, MBP, or MP.

    Bad apple for not offering a $400 laptop, that pressures me into getting a Dell! Bad apple for not offering me a fast car, that pressures me into buying a BMW!!
    I'm sorry, but your conclusions are horrible. You aren't looking at all the "facts", and then with the few you are using (out of context) you are drawing very stretched conclusions.

    You claim that Apple's monitors are selling well, but you have no facts to back that up. Apple doesn't post their sales numbers for products like this so you're just making it up. Those sales numbers could suck a$$ and you wouldn't know. And I believe they do suck,

    No, but we have little reason to believe that they aren't selling well enough, and good reason to believe they are. Why? Because if they weren't selling well, and they were highly marked up, than it wouldn't hurt apple to lower the price, and sell more units. But they haven't yet done that. So either Apple's marketing guys are complete idiots and missed business 101, or they are selling enough units to justify the price.

    but Apple won't tell you that, it sucks because they want them to suck. Keep reading.

    I believe Apple does this to encourage people to buy iMacs. If your willing to pony up $2400 or more on a Mac Pro then maybe an extra $500 doesn't bother you for the two 30" displays your going to use, and if all you can afford is mini Apple doesn't seem to mind you buying that Dell monitor. By pricing the monitors several hundred more than they are really worth, you are now in the iMac price range. I bet if you could see and add up the numbers, buying a mini and an over priced cinema display gives Apple the same profit margin as an iMac. Apple doesn't have a mid range tower. Again, because they want to sell you an iMac. By keeping their product line simple they reduce costs; making one widget as apposed to five different widgets is cheaper. But that limits choice.

    A very interesting theory, that seems plausible. However what is more likely is that Apple is selling enough units, and that they aren't overly priced for their intended purpose and intended competition (which is NOT Dell).

    I have an iMac, but I really don't want one. I want a mid-range tower and an external monitor. I'm not alone either. Apple's monitor price is a "choice incentive". It may help their bottom line, but it limits my choice. And since I hate Windows I'm forced into Apple's program.

    News flash, any monitor on the market today will work with your Mac. I know, it's amazing. Buy a cheap monitor and slap an Apple sticker on it if you like. Or go complain that NEC is limiting your choice by not offering a monitor in your price range, or that BMW is screwing you out of a car by not offering a car at 10 grand.

    So, back to a 17" cinema. Why would Apple do this? I don't think they will. A 17" iMac is only $899. That's where they make their money, oh, and people like me willing to pay premium because we value esthetics.

    They might do it, but it won't be a prosumer level monitor like the rest. It will use a cheaper panel so that it's in line with it's target audience (consumer budget mini buyers). There aren't many companies, if any, that sell pro specced monitors at 17" any more. And as those better panels become cheaper, there is even less reason to offer the pro guys such small screen space.

    Now, would you please, for the love of knowledge, go read the first post in this thread before making another reply. (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=252327)

    Thank you,
    ~Tyler




    sineplex
    Sep 19, 01:57 AM
    Nope, it's those 99 cents silicone case from HK!

    ok sounds great. post a link I'll buy that for 99c until I find something I really like.
    BTW What camera did you use to take the shot ? Makes it look much more than 99c




    hunkaburningluv
    Mar 28, 06:28 AM
    It is amazing how limited in vision some people are...

    Seriously people stuck with this idea that the future of gaming is going to be non-portable systems with game controllers forever are going to be very disappointed in the future.

    Ultimately gesture based movements and other mechanisms will be used for gaming, not a freaking glorified joystick. It is silly to believe otherwise.

    Again people saying you couldn't play with a touchscreen device without looking at it have no imagination or understanding. Definately within two years you will be shown to be horribly wrong on this point.

    You keep believing the future of gaming is going to remain in the hands of traditional 8 year console development cycles... It is not going to happen.

    It would be like saying you can't play any real game on a console, you need a pc for it. I certainly can do much more in terms of controlling and playing a game on a computer than I can do with any console controller.

    You really are deluded aren't you? You need to be REALISTIC about your expectations. You want to have a bet in this?

    I'm calling BS right now - there will always be a place for pads/sticks/mouse/keyboard it gives a vastly better tactile experience than a touchscreen. Touch gaming will improve, I will agree, but the majority of core gamers won't be playing core games on the device.

    Are you a gamer? Any gamer worth their salt is very much aware that the norm was a new gen every 5 years, not 8. But yeah, I'dsay we are probably looking at a 6/7 year cycle right now.

    Anyhoo, I digress. I'm still calling BS. yeah, I'm sure mobile gaming will improve, but it' not going to replace consoles or PC's for core gamers.

    I assume that's what you meant. Because we've seen touchscreen devices advance by leaps and bounds since June 2007. In two years' time it will very likely be an entirely new ballgame with such devices being a dominant force in tech, including gaming.

    This little demo is just barely scratching the surface.

    Really? Dominant as in more units out there or where it's a lead platform for development?

    I mean, you could say that android has the mobile touch screen market zipped up, but we both know that's because there's so many different handset out there.... Yeah there will be a load out there, but it will never be the main cash cow for games developers - the money is in consoles and to a much lesser extent now, PC gaming.

    You're sure about that? Considering the next Xbox isn't due for release till about 2015, and the PS4 probably later, and I'm pretty sure those systems will ship with controllers. The Kinect being an optional extra.

    And I seriously doubt the iPad will could be seen as a serious competitor to Games Consoles and PC gaming, in the same way my calculator is a competitor to my iPhone because it performs a same function, better than my iPhone does.

    you think? I suspect we'll see an announcement next year and a release in 2013 actually for the 360, the PS4 will probably be 2015. The 'WIIHD" or whatever it' called might be announced this year.........




    sachamun
    Nov 28, 07:44 AM
    Don't they already make one? Its called a 17" MacBook Pro... :)

    On that note...
    Does anyone else like the idea of a 19" or 20" macbook pro (/tablet?) as a true desktop replacement? Just small enough to fit a backpack.

    I could be mainly aimed at photo/video pros who don't often do thier work in tight spaces, but usually open up their notebook on a desk.

    There'd be much more room for additional internal hardware including battery, ram, speakers and hdd space.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment